Renew. Energy Environ. Sustain.
Volume 6, 2021
Achieving Zero Carbon Emission by 2030
Article Number 33
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 27 September 2021
  1. C. Chen, B. Zhao, Review of relationship between indoor and outdoor particles: I/O ratio, infiltration factor and penetration factor, Atmos. Environ. 45, 275–288 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D.A. Chwieduk, Towards modern options of energy conservation in buildings, Renew. Energy 101, 1194–1202 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. I. Sarbu, C. Sebarchievici, General review of ground-source heat pump systems for heating and cooling of buildings, Energy Build. 70, 441–454 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P.J. Bourne-Webb, T.M. Bodas Freitas, Thermally-activated piles and pile groups under monotonic and cyclic thermal loading − a review, Renew. Energy 147, 2572–2581 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Fadejev, R. Simson, J. Kurnitski, F. Haghighat, A review on energy piles design, sizing and modelling, Energy 122, 390–407 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Man, H. Yang, J. Wang, Study on hybrid ground-coupled heat pump system for air-conditioning in hot-weather areas like Hong Kong, Appl. Energy 87, 2826–2833 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Zhang, J. Wei, Analysis on the soil heat accumulation problem of ground source heat pump system in high temperature and high humidity areas, Energy Proc. 14, 198–204 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Z. Liu, Y. Li, W. Xu, H. Yin, J. Gao, G. Jin, L. Lun, G. Jin, Performance and feasibility study of hybrid ground source heat pump system assisted with cooling tower for one office building based on one Shanghai case, Energy 173, 28–37 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. K.F. Beckers, G.A. Aguirre, J.W. Tester, Hybrid ground-source heat pump systems for cooling-dominated applications: experimental and numerical case-study of cooling for cellular tower shelters, Energy Build. 177, 341–350 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N.R. Martins, G. Carrilho da Graça, Impact of outdoor PM2.5 on natural ventilation usability in California's nondomestic buildings, Appl. Energy 189, 711–724 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. N.R. Martins, G. Carrilho da Graça, Simulation of the effect of fine particle pollution on the potential for natural ventilation of non-domestic buildings in European cities, Build. Environ. 115, 236–250 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. N.R. Martins, G. Carrilho da Graça, Effects of airborne fine particle pollution on the usability of natural ventilation in office buildings in three megacities in Asia, Renew. Energy 117, 357–373 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D.B. Crawley, L.K. Lawrie, F.C. Winkelmann, W.F. Buhl, Y. Joe Huang, C.O. Pedersen, R.K. Strand, R.J. Liesen, D.E. Fisher, M.J. Witte, J. Glazer, EnergyPlus: creating a new-generation building energy simulation program, Energy Build. 33, 319–331 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Bravo Dias, G. Carrilho da Graça, P.M.M. Soares, Comparison of methodologies for generation of future weather data for building thermal energy simulation, Energy Build. 206, 109556 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Aguiar, INETI Synthetic Weather Data for Portugal. Instituto Nacional de Engenharia, Tecnologia e Inovação (INETI), 2005 [Google Scholar]
  16. ASHRAE, International Weather for Energy Calculations (IWEC Weather Files) Users Manual and CD-ROM, in American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA, United States, 2001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Weather Data | EnergyPlus, [last accessed August 2021] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Kottek, J. Grieser, C. Beck, B. Rudolf, F. Rubel, World map of the Köppen‑Geiger climate classification updated, Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15, 259–263 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Rubel, K. Brugger, K. Haslinger, I. Auer, The climate of the European Alps: Shift of very high resolution Köppen-Geiger climate zones 1800‑2100, Meteorologische Zeitschrift 26, 115–125 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Deru, K. Field, D. Studer, K. Benne, B. Griffith, P. Torcellini, B. Liu, M. Halverson, D. Winiarski, M. Rosenberg, M. Yazdanian, J. Huang, D. Crawley, U. S. Department of Energy Commercial Reference Building Models of the National Building Stock, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-5500-46861 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  21. Portaria n. ° 349‑D/2013 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  22. California Building Standards Commission, Title 24-Building Standards Code, Part 4-California Mechanical Code, California Code of Regulations (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 7730:2005 Ergonomics of the thermal environment − Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria (2005) [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Johnston, J. Counsell, P.A. Strachan, Trends in Office Internal Gains and the Impact on Space Heating and Cooling. CIBSE Technical Symposium, DeMontfort University, Leicester, UK (2011) [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Zhao, B. Lasternas, K.P. Lam, R. Yun, V. Loftness, Occupant behavior and schedule modeling for building energy simulation through office appliance power consumption data mining, Energy Build. 82, 341–355 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. ASHRAE, ASHRAE Handbook − Fundamentals. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA, United States (2013) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Malato Lerer, G. Carrilho da Graça, P.F. Linden, Building energy demand response simulation for an office tower in New York, in Proceedings of BS2013: 13th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Chambéry, France (2013), p. 2511–2518 [Google Scholar]
  28. G. Carrilho da Graça, N.R. Martins, C.S. Horta, Thermal and airflow simulation of a naturally ventilated shopping mall, Energy Build. 50, 177–188 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  29. I.S. Ertesvåg, Uncertainties in heat‑pump coefficient of performance (COP) and exergy efficiency based on standardized testing, Energy Build. 43, 1937–1946 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. D. Pahud, PILESIM2–simulation tool for heating/cooling systems with energy piles or multiple borehole heat exchangers − user manual, in ISAAC-DAC-SUPSI, Lugano, Switzerland (2007) [Google Scholar]
  31. G. Hellström, Duct Ground Heat Storage Model, Manual for Computer Code, Department of Mathematical Physics, University of Lund, Sweden (1989) [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Fossa, F. Minchio, The effect of borefield geometry and ground thermal load profile on hourly thermal response of geothermal heat pump systems, Energy 51, 323‑329 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. J.M. Corberan, D.P. Finn, C.M. Montagud, F.T. Murphy, K.C. Edwards, A quasi-steady state mathematical model of an integrated ground source heat pump for building space control, Energy Build. 43, 82 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Herkel, U. Knapp, J. Pfafferott, Towards a model of user behaviour regarding the manual control of windows in office buildings, Build. Environ. 43, 588–600 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. P.R. Warren, The analysis of single‑sided ventilation measurements, Air Infiltration Rev. 7, 3–5 (1986) [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Hähnlein, P. Bayer, G. Ferguson, P. Blum, Sustainability and policy for the thermal use of shallow geothermal energy, Energy Policy 59, 914–925 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.