PPCM thermal conductivity improvements.
|Enhancement technique||Composition||Enhancement of thermal conductivity||Ref.|
|NPs||Paraffin/expanded perlite (49.5 and 47.5) loaded with 1 and 5% wt. of graphene nano-platelets||Thermal conductivity of paraffin-expanded perlite-graphene nano-platelets (5%) enhanced by 1.66 and 2.5 times faster than paraffin/expanded perlite/graphene nano-platelets (1%) and paraffin alone, respectively.|||
|NPs||Paraffin/ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA)/graphene nanocomposites (0.7, 1.5, 3.6 and 7.0% wt.)||PCM with graphene of 0.7% had the highest thermal conductivity enhancement among all nanocomposites.|||
|NPs||Paraffin/ multi-walled carbon nanotubes and activated carbon||Paraffin/multi-walled carbon nanotube and paraffin/activated carbon composites' thermal conductivity are improved by 34.1% and 39.1%, respectively, compared with pure paraffin.|||
|NPs||Paraffin/ graphene oxide and graphene nano-plates||The thermal conductivity of PPCM based graphene oxide and graphene nano-platelets was enhanced by up to 360%.|||
|NPs||Paraffin/AL2O3, ZrO2 and SiC nanoparticles with 0%, 0.1%, 0.5%, 1%, 2%, 3%, 4% and 5%.||Adding 1% of nano-Al2O3, nano-ZnO2 and nano-SiC to paraffin wax enhanced its thermal conductivity by 3.3%, 1.8% and 4.2%, respectively.|||
|NPs||Organic montmorillonite (OMMT)/paraffin/grafted multi-walled nanotube (MWNT)||OMMT/paraffin/ MWNT composite's thermal conductivity is higher than that of the OMMT/paraffin and paraffin by 34% and 65%, respectively.|||
|NPs||Paraffin/ Fe2O3 (1%, 2%, 3%, 4 % and 5% wt. concentrations)||The paraffin/ Fe2O3 composite's thermal conductivity was improved over the paraffin alone by up to 30% at 3% Fe2O3 concentration.|||
|EG||Paraffin/EG (15%)||The thermal conductivity of paraffin/EG is higher by 6.5 times that of pure paraffin thermal conductivity.|||
|NPs + EG||Paraffin (90.6%) + expanded graphite + carbon fibers (1%)||The thermal conductivity of gypsum mortar increased by 36.0% with the addition of 1% carbon fibers.|||
|NPs + EG||Paraffin/ Cu, Al, Ni, and Fe/EG||The highest thermal conductivity obtained for paraffin/EG11%/Cu1.9% was nine times pure paraffin.|||
|Metallic foam||Paraffin/graphite foam composite||The paraffin/graphite foam composite's thermal conductivity in solid and liquid phases was higher by 980% and 1530% than pure paraffin wax.|||
|Metallic foam||Paraffin /copper foam metal composite||The thermal conductivity and heat storage time improved by 40%.|||
|Metallic foam||Paraffin (62%)/TiO2 foam||The thermal conductivity of paraffin composite was higher by about five times that of pure paraffin.|||
|Metallic foam||Paraffin/copper and nickel foams||The thermal conductivity of paraffin increased by 376% using copper foam against 205% for nickel foam.|||
|NPs + metallic foam||Paraffin/ polystyrene-carbon nanotubes/PolyHIPE foam||Thermal conductivity of the composite paraffin increased by 62% compared with pure paraffin|||
|Fins||Paraffin (RT82)/ longitudinal and triangular copper fins||The thermal conductivity of paraffin was improved using triangular fins by 18% compared with longitudinal fins.|||
|Fins||Paraffin/ Pin fins (square section-area of 1, 2 and 3 mm thickness)||The thermal conductivity and thermal performance of paraffin were enhanced by 4.3 at fins of 2 mm thickness.|||
|NPs + Fins||Paraffin(n-Octadecane)/ horizontal radial copper fins/ Al2O3 (1%–5% concentration)||The best thermal conductivity of paraffin was obtained at 3-fins and 5% NPs concentration, in which the melting time shortened by 28.3%.|||
|NPs + Fins||Paraffin/ graphene nano-platelets (1%, 3% and 5% concentration)/ Fins (longitudinal, circular and wire-wound)||The optimal thermal performance of PPCM was achieved with 1% graphene nanoplates and wire-wound fins. The melting time was reduced from 23.5 h to only 1.02 h compared with the PPCM without thermal enhancement.|||
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.