Table 3

Graduates’ ratings of the ability of different types of University qualifications to prepare them for working in the sustainable energy industry.

Degree types Degree type N Not at all relevant* Least able Moderately able Most able
Specialized undergraduate
multidisciplinary
(non-Engineering) SE degree   
Eng. 31 3 17 6 4
Multi. 17 0 8 7 2
All 64 3 28 13 7
Specialized undergraduate
SE Engineering degree   
Eng. 31 1 3 11 15
Multi. 17 0 4 6 6
All 64 1 7 21 21
Conventional undergraduate
degree (e.g. Science)
with major in SE   
Eng. 31 1 14 9 5
Multi. 17 0 7 8 2
All 64 1 21 19 8
Conventional undergraduate
Engineering degree
with major/stream in SE   
Eng. 31 0 4 10 16
Multi. 17 0 1 13 2
All 64 0 5 26 19
Specialized postgraduate
multidisciplinary SE degree   
Eng. 31 2 6 13 9
Multi. 17 0 2 8 6
All 64 2 8 24 16
Specialized postgraduate SE Engineering degree    Eng. 31 1 1 10 18
Multi. 17 0 1 8 7
All 64 1 3 18 28
Conventional postgraduate
non-Engineering degree
with major in SE   
Eng. 31 3 13 8 6
Multi. 17 1 6 6 3
All 64 4 19 17 10
Conventional postgraduate
Engineering degree with
major in SE   
Eng. 31 1 2 13 12
Multi. 17 0 5 9 2
All 64 1 8 23 16
*

Responders were asked to rank (relative to each other) what they felt (based on their experience) was the ability of different types of University qualifications to prepare them for working in the sustainable energy industry. “Least able” meant they felt the degree had the least ability to prepare them whilst “Most able” meant they felt it had the most ability.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.